/m/ - meta

>>42
>>43
God bless you

>>21
>>16
>>41
I feel like those are a little too small desu.

>>6
Yeah I've tried a few times to highlight newer books, especially when something like the booker longlist is published, but it never gets traction.
I agree that /lit/ moves too fast for new stuff nobody really knows and don't want to give a chance.
Admittedly a lot of new stuff is perhaps too modern for the demographic on here, but on something like the booker longlist you're going to have at least one book that could work for discussion on here. Even if 90% of discussion ends up whining about the "woke" crap I'd take it to engage with something new.

>>5
>>6
Also, /lit/ absolutely needs a catalog function, and it's very dated to redirect your page back to the main board (instead of staying in the thread) after making a post

>>11
disregard I suck cocks, catalog button is at the bottom of the page

>>2
This picture was taken by Stanley Twardowicz and is posted on my wall. RIP Jack Kerouac.

>>2
this picture is hung up next to my shrine. read the book jack kerouac at the wild boar. fuck Sampas.

whokilledkerouac.com

We're already so slow, I would hate to see this place split into a dozen different mini boards right away.

Just my two cents anyways.

>>8
Nobody said anything about a dozen.
Just one (or two) for sci-fi and fantasy.

>>9
Just wait until high rates of bump conflict piss an active mod off so they contact Anonymous Dev.

Good idea!
We're thinking about creating an art and critique cyclical thread on /lit/ to gauge interest. If that works out well, an /a/rt board will be added.

The spoilers should now work. Thanks for bringing this to my attention.

Another way to activate spoilers is with double asterisks

>>25
Good job pal! Next thing we need is (You)'s