No.231
>>230>discussion and presentation of visual artdoes Kino (no slop ofc) count?
No.232
>>231NTA but as long as its max kino, we good
No.233
>>231For the time being sure. I think depending on how this evolves, we'll add a /f/ilm or /a/rt board.
No.238
>>234I watched the first season of Arcane a couple of months ago. It was good. You're right about the animation style. It's something wholly unique. The characters are alright if a bit cliche, the plot is good. But from what I can tell it does fall off with the second season.
From what I've heard about the show Riot Games intentionally stamped new animation techniques together with the studio out of nothing and that's why it looks unlike anything else.
No.239
>>235Wow, this is remarkable. I just started exploring Symbolism and now I can add Redon to my list. Thanks, man
No.244
>>238Your second paragraph explains a lot, I can only hope these animation techniques spread among the medium, after all Arcane was only released in
>2021so 4 and a half years back. Maybe it was lightning-in-a-bottle. Well at least we got Dishonored, not quite the same graphically - especially in lighting - but similar enough.
Did you watch any episode of season 2? I'm curious as to how the writers stumbled, from what I've heard they
ignored the Zaunite-Piltovian war entirely . Crass mistake if true, especially with all the built-up for it in season 1.
>>235Odd, the woman among the colors shows no eyes. Why did Odilon draw her like that?
No.302
>>300>digitsReally like the ambience in this piece. The geese and sea creatures making of the background. Reminds me a little bit of Max Ernst's la femme cent tetes.
No.318
>>290I love the composition and color. Masterfully done, and it's some rather unique.
No.319
>>315Would let the Sphynx crush me in a chokehold till i passed out
No.335
>>322i can fucking dig it
No.336
>>326getting awful alchemical in here…i can dig it
No.352
>>340stay blessed never change
>>345would you believe it if i told you i recognized this one
>>346>>350never seen these, but i can dig it.
No.558
>>546Weirdly similar to some of the earlier iterations of generative AI.